Saturday, December 28, 2013

Squalene: The Flu Vaccine A Public Health Experiment


It's not the point of the Flu Vaccine makes you get the flu.
It's more of how do you know if it is an untested vaccine?
Or what is in the vaccine? 

Yes they did make kids take the vaccine! There was a big push for the kids to
take the vaccine before they got enrolled in to school in my town.
I had some parents ask me about it. At the time I did not know anything about it.
But I did not like the fascism about it, making the kids take it or not get in school!
Then only to find out it was untested! No fun for a small town!
http://www.yourspine.com/Chiropractic/Chiropractic+Swine+Flu+Trials.aspx

http://newsok.com/state-kids-to-get-shot-at-swine-flu-vaccine/article/3387609

~~~~"Swine Flu Vaccine – A Public Health Experiment."

What do human brain and nerve tissues, Gulf War Syndrome, some health supplements and GlaxoSmithKline’s new swine flu vaccine adjuvant all have in common? The answer: squalene. Its presence in fatty tissues and supplements is generally benign or beneficial; its presence in GSK’s vaccine is morbid.
GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) holds the contract to supply Canada’s pandemic H1N1 vaccine – a vaccine containing an unlicensed additive, specifically the AS03 squalene based adjuvant. AS03 is designed to stimulate a dramatically increased immune response which results in less vaccine antigen being required in each vaccine dose.

“Canada will likely use adjuvanted swine flu vaccine,” says Dr. David Butler-Jones, head of the Public Health Agency of Canada. Neither Canada nor the U.S. has licensed flu vaccines containing adjuvants. So adding one would erect regulatory hurdles that would either require additional clinical trials – prolonging time to vaccine delivery – or a decision to use the product under ‘emergency use’ authorizations.
Many Canadians are concerned that trigger happy health officials will “cry wolf” and implement “emergency” powers available through the Quarantine Act and Federal Emergencies Act to strong arm the population into submitting to the H1N1 vaccine.

Experimental swine flu vaccines being fast-tracked, and which side-step normal approval procedures and testing have many people concerned about their safety. There is concern that the vaccine could cause worse problems than the swine flu itself “The race to create a vaccine for the H1N1 flu virus could place the public at a greater risk than the illness the vaccine is designed to prevent, says a University of Manitoba ethicist. Arthur Schafer, director of the University of Manitoba’s Centre for Professional and Applied Ethics, said it appears a vaccine will be rushed to the public before it can be determined properly that it’s safe – or if it even works. Schafer said the real question is one of relative risks and benefits. The H1N1 flu, he said, has proved to date to be no more lethal than seasonal flu. Vaccines to treat seasonal flu have not been effective, and there is no evidence to suggest a vaccine for H1N1 will be more effective, he added.”

For months the media has bombarded us with Pandemic Flu propaganda while the government, urged on by misguided pressure from the World Health Organization (WHO) makes plans to stockpile enough doses of an untried, experimental vaccine for mass use in Canada. A Canadian Press articles says that “federal officials announced Canada had ordered 50.4 million doses – enough, they believe, to protect all Canadians who want to be vaccinated”.

On August 14, GlaxoSmithKline announced it has started human testing of its swine flu vaccine. It plans to test its vaccine in more than 9,000 people in Canada, the United States and Europe as part of 16 clinical trials. “In Canada and the U.S., Glaxo is testing vaccines with and without adjuvants……We aim to get the first doses out in September,”and “to fill major orders by the end of the year or early 2010.” (7)
While the media has alluded to the new H1NI vaccine containing a novel adjuvant, very little information about this new vaccine ingredient has leaked out. Certainly nothing about AS03’s potential for harm has been disclosed by health officials. Adding insult to injury, the HIN1 vaccine also contains thimerosal, the neurotoxic mercury based preservative.

Several experimental pandemic vaccines containing squalene adjuvants are being unleashed on populations around the world at this time. AS03 and MF59 are patented adjuvants being used by some of the companies contracted to make the swine flu vaccines. MF59 and ASO3, contain squalene which has been repeatedly linked in the medical literature to cause serious autoimmune problems, and even more research links Gulf War Syndrome in soldiers to squalene based adjuvants in anthrax vaccine.

A recent WHO Press Conference confirmed that there is no safety data regarding the use of squalene adjuvanted vaccines for pregnant women, asthmatics and children between the ages of 6 months to 3 years. Both pregnant women and young children are targeted groups on the priority list for injection, along with health care providers.

Adjuvants are immune boosting chemicals which allow smaller doses of the disease antigens to be used and speed up the time it takes to produce enough vaccine for a population. When injected into the body, adjuvants provoke a powerful immune response not only to the disease particles being injected, but also stimulate the immune system to make antibodies against the adjuvant. Since squalene is an oil found naturally in the human body, an immune response of antibodies against the naturally occurring squalene already present in the body can provoke the immune system to wage war on its host. This type of aberrant immune system response is the basis of autoimmune diseases.

Autoimmune diseases typically take months and years to develop. Studies comparing the long term health outcome of groups injected with squalene adjuvanted vaccines, with those receiving traditional non-adjuvanted vaccines, or no vaccine, have not been done. Without these comparative studies allowing for the lengthy time frame needed for the emergence of autoimmune diseases, a mass vaccination program with vaccines containing hazardous substances like squalene is a reckless experiment by public health officials and governments who fund it.

According to investigative journalist, Garry Matsumoto, squalene was injected via an experimental anthrax vaccine into troops going to the first Gulf War. Immunologist, Pamela Asa connected it with Gulf War Syndrome when she learned of a participant in a herpes vaccine trial who had received a squalene-based adjuvant as a placebo; he had subsequently developed autoimmune symptoms almost identical to Gulf War Syndrome. Dr Asa asked virologist, Robert Garry to develop a test to detect antibodies against squalene. That test has been the key diagnostic tool used to determine if patients’ autoimmune diseases are linked to squalene in vaccines they have received.

Russell Blaylock MD discusses the hazards of squalene adjuvants – “Because squalene, the main ingredient in MF-59 [a squalene based adjuvant], can induce hyperimmune responses and induce autoimmunity, a real danger exists for prolonged activation of the brain’s immune cells, the microglia. This type of prolonged activation has been strongly associated with such diseases as multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, ALS and possibly vaccine-related encephalitis. It has been shown that activation of the systemic immune system, as occurs with vaccination, rapidly activates the brain’s microglia at the same time, and this brain inflammation can persist for long periods.

Even as early as the 1930s, injected oils were notorious for inducing illness. They were considered much too dangerous for humans but were used to induce autoimmune disease in animals unfortunate enough to be undergoing lab tests. Experiments at UCLA and U of Florida Medical Schools, the Swedish Karolinska Institute, The Polish Academy of Science and many other research institutes have corroborated the powerful autoimmune-eliciting effects of squalene and squalene-based adjuvants specifically.

However, seeking vigorous immune boosting effects for vaccines showing poor efficacy, drug regulators have rashly ignored the decades-old evidence of harm. Research bodies have been developing vaccines containing squalene-based adjuvants for some time now, and some of these have already been marketed in Europe. One example is the Italian influenza vaccine, FLUAD, which was licensed in 1997. Although trials showed it to be safe for the elderly and safe over the short term, adverse events discovered post marketing and listed in the FLUAD monograph include diseases virtually the same as Gulf War Syndrome.

A noteworthy point to understand is that studies claiming it is safe to inject squalene into the human body have primarily been sponsored by the pharmaceutical industry or the military. However, the more than two dozen independent peer reviewed published studies documenting the health destructive effects of squalene as an injected adjuvant all reach a similar conclusion – squalene typically induces a range of autoimmune diseases when injected into the body.

Then there are questions as to whether or not the swine flu vaccine will even work. Looking at the track record of how poorly effective regular seasonal flu vaccines are, makes the prospect of a rushed experimental vaccine having any significant benefit even bleaker. There is even some research showing that mass vaccination could cause more widespread infection from a mutated vaccine resistant strain of an influenza virus rendering a mass vaccination program more harmful than helpful.
Who will take responsibility when people are injured by this new experimental vaccine? Except for the province of Quebec, Canada provides no compensation to vaccine injury victims. Contrast this to the U.S. vaccine injury compensation system which has already paid out close to $2 billion dollars in damage claims for injuries caused by vaccines that have been fully tested and deemed “safe” for routine childhood vaccinations.

It’s possible that delivery of the GSK ‘pandemic’ vaccine will be delayed so long that the public health experiment will be ditched. As Dr. Richard Schabas, MOH for Hastings and Prince Edward Counties, has said, most swine flu cases have been mild, the virus is already diminishing in the southern hemisphere and, “This is the fourth pandemic alarm in six years. And the first three have been wrong.” Let’s hope the squall blows over.
http://vran.org/in-the-news/swine-flu-vaccine-a-public-health-experiment

 ~~~~"FDA Approves Experimental H5N1 Bird Flu Vaccine with Reactive AS03 Adjuvant for U.S. Stockpile."

Squalene Adjuvants Never Licensed Before in U.S.
Squalene adjuvants, which ramp up the immune response, have never been licensed for use in the U.S. However, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) paved the way for a squalene adjuvant to be included in U.S. vaccines with its November 2013 approval of the first influenza A (H5N1) monovalent “bird flu” vaccine: GlaxoSmithKline’s Q-Pan vaccine that contains the controversial oil-in-water emulsion adjuvant AS03.
Q-Pan vaccine will be added to the U.S. pandemic emergency vaccine stockpile. Although there is no H5N1 influenza pandemic underway to justify fast-tracked approval of the experimental AS03-adjuvanted bird flu vaccine, the speedy FDA approval comes amid mounting evidence that AS03 adjuvants are associated with development of serious autoimmune and neurological disorders like narcolepsy.
GSK’s Squalene-Adjuvanted H5N1 Bird Flu Vaccine: Federally Funded
Approved for adults aged 18 years or older, right now GSK’s Q-Pan H5N1 influenza vaccine is only included in the U.S. vaccine stockpile and is not commercially available for widespread public use … yet.
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) purchased the vaccine from GSK to stockpile it for a potential future H5N1 pandemic emergency, in the event the bird flu virus develops the ability to spread easily from human to human. GSK will make the vaccine commercially available if directed by the Biomedical Advanced Development and Research Authority (BARDA), which financially supported the vaccine development program through a federally funded contract.  [In March 2013, GSK and Texas A&M announced that DHHS had approved the establishment of a $91 million influenza vaccine manufacturing plant facility in Texas that would eventually enable GSK to manufacture influenza vaccine based on the Vivalis novel EB66 duck embryonic stem cell line ).
The FDA cited one study as the basis for their approval of Q-Pan, but reported very few details. The study compared 3,400 adults who were given the vaccine to 1,100 adults who were given a placebo. Out of 2,000 evaluated study subjects, 91 percent of vaccinated adults aged 18 to 64 years “developed a level of antibodies expected to reduce the risk for influenza.” Additionally, 74 percent of vaccinated adults aged 65 years or older also developed this level of immune response.
Vaccine side effects included injection site pain as the most common, but also muscle aches, headache and fatigue. The FDA said it would collaborate with GSK to conduct additional safety and effectiveness studies, “in the event the vaccine is released for public use during an H5N1 influenza virus pandemic.”
Controversial H5N1 Lethal Virus Research Hit Roadblocks
There are a couple of things wrong with this picture. First and foremost, research surrounding H5N1 “bird flu” viruses has been rooted in controversy. Remember the two scientists, who were asked to temporarily halt their research projects on the H5N1 strain of the bird flu virus because they were deliberately creating a genetically engineered and more lethal version of the virus in airborne transmissible form that could infect humans? After a firestorm of contentious debate with some scientists calling for an end to the research because it was too risky (the research was later resumed), in March 2013 the FDA delayed its decision regarding approval of GSK’s Q-Pan H5N1 vaccine.
The decision to delay approval came despite a unanimous vote in November 2012 by the FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) to recommend Q-Pan H5N1 vaccine be licensed for inclusion in the national stockpile.  Even though a delayed FDA staff decision usually indicates that additional review time is needed for the product, GSK claimed the delay was simply because of an administrative matter.
http://www.nvic.org/FDA-Approves-Squalene-H5N1-Bird-Flu-Vaccine.aspx

***There are many stories out there about the Flu Vaccine like it makes you sick.
Not really scientifically tested to see if it is true, but in surveys it points to it being true.

My whole life I only got sick if I took a flu vaccine vs not taking it.
Others say it also using their life history as proof. It's their body they know it!

Also is some far-out things like it changes your DNA to keep you from having
a human evolution. Might be true who knows!
But squalene does change DNA it's some nasty stuff and what is it doing in a
vaccine is anyone's guess!

~~~~
"Multiple DNA Elements for Sterol Regulatory Element-Binding Protein and NF-Y Are Responsible for Sterol-Regulated Transcription of the Genes for Human 3-Hydroxy-3-Methylglutaryl Coenzyme A Synthase and Squalene Synthase."

The expression of the human SREBP-2 gene is transcriptionally regulated in a cooperative
manner by sterol regulatory element-binding proteins (SREBPs) and the general transcription
factor NF-Y [Sato, R., Inoue, J., Kawabe, Y., Kodama, T., Takano, T., and Maeda, M. (1996)
J. Biol. Chem. 271, 26461-26464]. To understand the sterol-dependent transcriptional
regulation by these factors in detail, we have examined the regulation of the
3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG CoA) synthase and squalene synthase
genes, whose promoters have multiple potential sterol regulatory elements (SRE, SREBP binding site)
and NF-Y binding sites. The promoter of the human HMG CoA synthase gene was cloned,
sequenced, and functionally characterized by means of reporter gene assays.

The results indicate that an inverted CCAAT box, two SRE motifs and two Sp1 sites
localized in a 90-bp region coordinately regulate the transcription. In the case of the
human squalene synthase promoter, two SRE motifs and an inverted CCAAT box
between the motifs localized in a 51-bp region are responsible for the sterol-regulated
transcription of the gene. Gel mobility shift assay reveals that these two inverted
CCAAT boxes are recognized by NF-Y. The involvement of multiple responsive
elements in the transcription of HMG CoA synthase and squalene synthase seems
to induce a higher level of sterol-dependent regulation (3.5 to 5.8-fold) compared
with that of the SREBP-2 promoter, which contains a single pair of SRE motif and
CCAAT box (1.8 to 2.6-fold).

Reporter gene assays using constructs containing various nucleotide spacing lengths
between the SRE motif and the CCAAT box demonstrate that the 16 to 20-bp
spacing range is required for maximal transcriptional regulation.
These results agree with the findings that the distances between the two
motifs in the known sterol responsive elements in several genes, including the human
HMG CoA synthase and squalene synthase genes, are in this range.
http://jb.oxfordjournals.org/content/123/6/1191

~~~~"Squalene: The Swine Flu Vaccine’s Dirty Little Secret Exposed 

Why are Vaccinations Dangerous?"

The presumed intent of a vaccination is to help you build immunity to potentially harmful organisms that cause illness and disease. However, your body's immune system is already designed to do this in response to organisms which invade your body naturally.

Most disease-causing organisms enter your body through the mucous membranes of your nose, mouth, pulmonary system or your digestive tract – not through an injection.

 These mucous membranes have their own immune system, called the IgA immune system. It is a different system from the one activated when a vaccine is injected into your body.

Your IgA immune system is your body's first line of defense. Its job is to fight off invading organisms at their entry points, reducing or even eliminating the need for activation of your body's immune system.

When a virus is injected into your body in a vaccine, and especially when combined with an immune adjuvant like squalene, your IgA immune system is bypassed and your body's immune system kicks into high gear in response to the vaccination.

Injecting organisms into your body to provoke immunity is contrary to nature, and vaccination carries enormous potential to do serious damage to your health.
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/08/04/squalene-the-swine-flu-vaccines-dirty-little-secret-exposed.aspx

What is the resolve? Help your immune system!
For the most part I see is vitamin D3! When you look at China and other places that
does not get a lot of sun light because of smog, it points to much bad!
Mushrooms, mold etc are made in the dark. So even with Vitamin D3 that is made in
the body by being in the sun light you see the lack of sunlight is not a good thing.

N1H1 etc hurts people because their immune system is low in the first place!
Kind of like when I worked overnight at Walmart. I got sick a lot there.
I see it as I did not get much sun light being I was sleeping all day long and
working at night. Being in a public place did not help. With my "Day Job" now
I still am working in a public place and I have not got sick as I did from Walmart.
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/161618.php

Vitamin D3 goes to your bones. That is important because bone marrow is the
heart of your immune system.
http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/000560.htm

No comments: