There is much going on in Sweden that many elsewhere are sort of kept in the dark
from knowing. There is a big inequality problem in Sweden.
And with the money up high it's easy to understand why many will do anything to keep the
road going where it is going. Any person trying to divert the road is making
"a dangerous experiment in group hate." The rich will do anything to keep their money!
Sort of noted in the Bill Hicks video It's just a Ride "Shut him up! We have a lot invested
in this ride! SHUT HIM UP! Look at
my furrows of worry. Look at my big bank account,
and my family. This
just has to be real." http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iMUiwTubYu0
~~~"Swedish equality fades away as rich get richer."
Sweden has seen the steepest increase in
inequality over 15 years amongst the
34 OECD nations, with disparities
rising at four times the pace of the
United States, the think tank said. Once
the darling of the political left,
heavy state control and wealth
distribution through
high taxes and generous benefits gave the country's
have-nots an enviable standard of
living at the expense of the
wealthiest members of society.
Although
still one of the most equal countries in the world, the last two
decades
have seen a marked change. Market reforms have helped the
economy become one
of Europe's best performers but this has Swedes
wondering if their love affair with
state welfare was coming to an end. The
real tipping point came in 2006 when the
centre-right government swept
to power, bringing an end to a Social Democratic era
which stretched for
most of the 20th century.
Swedes
had grown increasingly weary of their high taxes and with more jobs
going
overseas, the new government laid out a plan to fine-tune the old
welfare system.
It slashed income taxes, sold state assets and tried to
make it pay to work.
Spending on
welfare benefits such as pensions, unemployment and incapacity
assistance has
fallen by almost a third to 13 percent of GDP from the
early nineties, putting Sweden only
just above the 11 percent OECD
average.
At the other end of the spectrum, tax changes and housing market reforms
have made the rich richer. Since
the mid-80s, income from savings, private pensions
or rentals, jumped
10 percent for the richest fifth of the population while falling one
percent for the poorest 20 percent.
RICH MAN, POOR MAN
Critics say the changes have left many behind.
In
a small, dim room in central Stockholm, about 20 homeless Swedes
huddled
together for an hour-long radio show which they produce weekly
to raise awareness
of those on the streets. "The
soul of a man" - a song from the Great Depression in the
United States -
plays in between speakers and poetry readings while they warm up
with
free coffee and hot dogs. At a
waterfront conference centre across town,
the head of the region's
biggest bank defended the hefty profits banks are making
on housing
loans. The CEO himself will soon be
moving into a more than $3 million
apartment which the bank recently
purchased in one of Stockholm's ritziest
neighborhoods. Eurostat
said recently that after Bulgaria, Sweden had the
second biggest rise
in the percentage of its population deemed at-risk-of poverty.
Jenny
Lindroth, who runs the social department at Situation Sthlm, a magazine
sold by the homeless and addicts, says welfare changes are hurting the
vulnerable.
"Some people can't live up to it, they can't take it, they
can't handle it," she said.
The number of people selling Situation has more than doubled to about 500 in
five years and they are getting younger. A
recent study by the National Board of
Health and Welfare showed a 25
percent jump to 4,500 in the number faced with
"acute" homeless
situations - those who required emergency accommodation,
shelter or
slept outdoors - compared with 2005.
NO UTOPIA
These
diverging pictures of Sweden are increasingly common and are also
being
seen in neighboring Finland and Denmark, albeit at a slower pace.
"I
certainly don't think Sweden is a utopia. Sweden has become much more
of a fairly normal European country," said Stefan Folster, chief
economist at the
Confederation of Swedish Enterprise. On
the class war safari, participants were
first bused through a
neighborhood south of Stockholm, where some 10 percent
of the residents
are on social benefits. Then they
headed to "The Sunny Side",
stopping by a luxury hotel next to a marina
which is packed with gleaming yachts
in the summer before viewing
sprawling villas in the area.
"The
differences were just so completely clear in these two areas," said
28-year-old
Anna Svensson, one of the organizers. "We wanted to show
what it really looked like,
and where the money and the power can
actually be found."
The tour was heavily criticized. A columnist for the daily Dagens Nyheter called it
"a dangerous experiment in group hate".
"It feels like we are being treated like animals," a teenager from the area
interviewed by Swedish television.
Some
believe the latest trends in Sweden may hurt the centre-right
government, especially if unemployment, running near 8 percent, remains
high
as the country heads towards new elections in 2014.
"This
is going to be ammunition for the opposition in Sweden," said
Soren
Holmberg, a political science professor at Gothenburg University.
He
believes there is still fundamentally strong support for the welfare
state
and that the jobless rate and changes to benefits such as
healthcare will be
increasingly in focus. The
government has defended its policies.
Finance Minister Anders Borg
called the rising income gap "troublesome"
but said it was still low
relative to other countries. "While
it is important to have
a cohesive society, growth and social
flexibility are also important, so those
must be balanced," he said. Markus
Jantti, a Professor of Economics at
Stockholm University's Swedish
Institute for Social Research, fears Sweden
will see a long period of
rising inequality.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/03/21/us-sweden-inequality-idUSBRE82K0W320120321
There was also a law many wanted to get passed it had to do with pay, for the
high up, CEO's. As in a law that they can't make more in a month than their low end
worker makes in a year!
That was a good plan vs the end road of loss jobs by the issues of inequality making
many poor. Many customers poor makes less rich, slow growth as the most are poor
to the point of shutting down smaller towns due to the fact most of the residents
can not afford much closing down many places! So saying passing the law would
drive out their most savvy workers is still the same as the result of having many poor
driving down sales to slow growth why stay there and make something the
many can't afford to buy.
All of this in the end is just pushing more Squatters and I am talking about
the South American types in the 100,000's! And that is not bad it's a start of a
need for action as the people stand together they will not be walked over to make
someone richer!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Squatting
~~~"A 45-Story Walkup Beckons the Desperate."
The office tower, one of Latin America’s tallest skyscrapers, was meant
to be an emblem
of Venezuela’s entrepreneurial mettle. But that era is
gone. Now, with more than
2,500 squatters making it their home, the
building symbolizes something else entirely in this
city’s center. The squatters live in the uncompleted high-rise, which lacks several
basic
amenities like an elevator. The smell of untreated sewage
permeates the corridors.
Children scale unlit stairways guided by the
glow of cellphones. Some recent arrivals
sleep in tents and hammocks. The skyscraper, surrounded by billboards and murals
proclaiming the advance of President Hugo Chávez’s “Bolivarian revolution,”
is a
symbol of the financial crisis that struck the country in the
1990s, the expanded state
control over the economy that came after Mr.
Chávez took office in 1999 and the
housing shortage that has worsened
since then, leading to widespread squatter
takeovers in this city.
Few of the building’s terraces have guardrails. Even walls and
windows
are absent on many floors. Yet dozens of DirecTV satellite dishes dot
the
balconies. The tower commands some of the most stunning views of
Caracas.
It contains some of its worst squalor. “I never let my child out of my sight,” said
Yeaida Sosa, 29, who lives
with her 1-year-old daughter, Dahasi, on the seventh floor
overlooking a
bustling artery, Avenida Andrés Bello. Ms. Sosa said residents
were
horrified after a young girl recently fell to her death from a high
floor.
Some families have walled off their terraces with cinder blocks,
blotting out the
sun to avoid such tragedies. Others, aware of the
risks, prefer to let in the breeze
flowing off El Ávila, the emerald
green mountain looming over Caracas.
“God decides when we enter his
kingdom,” said Enrique Zambrano, 22,
an electrician who lives on the
19th floor. Mr. Zambrano, like many of the other
squatters in the skyscraper, says
he is an evangelical Christian. Their pastor is
Alexander Daza, 33, a
former gang member who found religion in prison.
Mr. Daza, commonly
known as El Niño, or The Kid, led the occupation of the
Tower of David
in October 2007. Back then, the building had already been vacant for
more than a decade.
Its developer, Mr. Brillembourg, a dashing horse breeder, died
of cancer
at age 56 in 1993, leaving behind hobbled companies.
The government
absorbed their assets, including the unfinished skyscraper,
during a
1994 banking crisis. Robert Neuwirth of New York, the author of
“Shadow Cities,” a book about
squatter settlements on four continents,
said the Tower of David may be
the world’s highest squatter building.
Once one of Latin America’s most developed cities, Caracas now grapples
with an
acute housing shortage of about 400,000 units, breeding building
invasions.
In the area around the Tower of David, squatters have
occupied 20 other properties,
including the Viasa and Radio Continente
towers. White elephants occupying the
cityscape, like the Sambil
shopping mall close to the Tower of David and seized
by the government,
now house flood victims.
Private construction of housing here has virtually ground to a halt because
of fears of government expropriation.
The government, hobbled by inefficiency,
has built little housing of
its own for the poor. The policies toward squatters are
also unclear and
in flux, effectively allowing many to stay in once empty properties.
On occasion, Mr. Chávez has called for squatters to be dislodged. But in January,
he urged the poor to occupy unused land in well-heeled parts of Caracas.
Then he qualified these remarks by asking them to have “patience” as officials tried to
build low-income housing. Many here refuse to wait. The Tower of David stands as
a parable of hope for some and of dread for others.
“That building is a symbol of Venezuela’s decline,” said Benedicto Vera,
55,
an activist in downtown Caracas. “What’s our future if our people
are living
like animals in unsafe skyscrapers?”
Yet squatters, who live on 28 stories and plan to go higher, have
created a
semblance of order within the skyscraper they now call their
own. Sentries with
walkie-talkies guard entrances. Each inhabited floor
has electricity, jury-rigged
to the grid, and water is transported up
from the ground floor.
Strivers abound in the skyscraper. They chafe at being called
“invaders,”
the term here for squatters, preferring the less contentious
word “neighbor.”
A beauty salon operates on one floor. On another, an
unlicensed dentist applies the
brightly colored braces that are the rage in Caracas street fashion.
Almost every floor has a small bodega. Julieth Tilano, 26, lives inside a small shop on the
seventh floor with
her husband and in-laws.
They sell everything from plantains to Pepsi
and Belmont cigarettes. Her husband,
Humberto Hidalgo, 23, has a side
business in which he charges children from the
skyscraper 50 cents per
half-hour to play PlayStation games on the four television
sets in the
family’s living room. “There’s opportunity in this tower,”
said Mr. Hidalgo, who immigrated here last year from Valledupar, Colombia.
Some residents own cars parked in the building’s garage.
Others
sanguinely point to their trim physiques, a result of going up and down
the stairs
each day. For others, any roof over one’s head is better than
none.
That is the view of Jordon Moore, 37, a squatter on the seventh floor
whom everyone
simply calls “the American.” Mr. Moore, who speaks English
with a hint of the
West Indies, regales visitors with tales of the
“gang life” in Brooklyn, where he
says he lived for years, and of an
attempt to break into the Venezuelan hip-hop
scene that went awry. “I ended up living on the street in this city, and this is better
than the street,” he said. A neighbor, José Hernández, 30, agreed.
Still, he said he wanted to
leave the skyscraper one day.
For now, he sleeps with his wife and
daughter in one bed under mosquito
netting, protection from dengue
fever. In his apartment, once meant to be a banker’s
corner office, he showed
the view, which included a mosque’s minaret and, in the
distance,
Petare, the patchwork of hillside slums where he grew up.
Now Mr.
Hernández dons a tie and jacket each day and goes to work at,
of all
places, a bank. “They call me an invader and I work in the credit department
of Banco de
Venezuela,” said Mr. Hernández, referring to the state-owned
institution
that he says employs him. “Society hates us, and the
government doesn’t know
what to do with us. Do they really think we want
to be living in the Tower of David?”
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/01/world/americas/01venezuela.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
Swedish equality one way or another!
Is it worth it to go as we all are heading for or just pay a living wage!
The poor has power to pull all down with them. Now if that is not a job loss what is?
Getting the word out is more than gold!
http://www.zazzle.com/squatter+tshirts