Wednesday, December 9, 2015

Middle Class not Dominant

This is something that is showing more in what I see in small towns the bottom
of the bottom getting desperate. Crime from the poor is jumping more than ever.
In my town the slums are really getting bad. The poor side of town 61% of the
town has always been like Detroit but it really is getting like it, for real!

This is a red flag I am holding up here!

The poor is going MadMax! And the middle Class is getting pulled down with them.
It's a big divide going from poor to the 001% from that I do see the MadMax life
popping up from the divide! More noted by the high up Walmart.
And to note, why I do what I do for the workers! http://walmart1percent.org

Give it's also stupid Republicans with their businesses make jobs thinking.
Like you can have a business with no one walking in the store to buy stuff to
give the store owners money so they can pay their workers.
The pay is too low to consume anything! As like me, being me I plan to
unplug my refrigerator being there is really nothing in there anyway.
It helps to offset a bit for using the heater in the winter.
I'm ok with that, it's changing times!

And that is why crime also goes up to get money to live or to go to
jail where you get food and heat in the winter vs how they are living.
Basic Sociology!

~~~~~The middle class no longer dominates in the U.S.
Middle class Americans now comprise less than half, or 49.9%, of the nation's
population, down from 61% in 1971, according to a new Pew Research Center
report. For Pew, middle class Americans live in households earning between
two-thirds to two times the nation's median income. In 2014, that ranged from
$41,900 to $125,600 for a three-person household.

For decades, the middle class had been the core of the country.
A healthy middle class kept America strong, experts and politicians said.

But more recently, these residents have struggled under stagnating wages and
soaring costs. Presidential candidates on both sides of the political aisle are
campaigning on ways to bolster the nation's middle class and increase opportunities
to climb the economic ladder.

The steady decline of the middle class is yet another sign of economic polarization,
said Rakesh Kochhar, associate director of research at Pew. Not only are more
Americans shifting into the upper and lower classes, but they are moving into the
higher range of the upper class and the lower range of the lower class.
This is yet another sign of growing income inequality, he said.

"There are fewer opportunities that place people in the middle of the income distribution,"
Kochhar said. One silver lining, however, is that more people are moving up the
ladder than down. The ranks of the upper class are growing faster,
according to Pew's research.

Senior citizens were most likely to have shifted into the upper class since 1971.
The share of Americans age 65 and over in the upper bracket increased nearly 27%
over that time. Married couples with no children and black Americans also saw larger gains.

Those most likely to fall into the lower class were those with only a high school degree
and high school dropouts, as well as unmarried men.

Here's another sign of how growing income inequality is squeezing the middle class.
Since 1970, upper class households saw their median income soar 47% to $174,600 in
2014. Meanwhile, the middle class only got a 34% boost to $73,400. Still, they have been
more prosperous than the lower-income Americans, who only received a 28% bump
to $24,074.

Some research shows that increased income inequality and a hollowing out of a nation's
middle class stunts economic growth, Kochhar said.

Looking at it another way, the upper class now controls 49% of the nation's aggregate
income, up from 29% in 1970.

The middle class used to earn the largest slice of the nation's income. It held 62% in 1970,
but that share has since fallen to 43%.

The lower class, meanwhile, holds 9% of the country's income, just under the 10% it
earned in 1970.

The rich are not only trumping the middle class in terms of income. They've also seen their
wealth soar over the past 40 years.

The median net worth of upper class families doubled between 1983 and 2013, up
to $650,100. But the wealth of the middle class has increased a near negligible 2%
over that time to $98,100. At least they fared better than lower-income Americans,
who saw their wealth drop 18% to $9,500.

For its wealth calculations, Pew used data from the Federal Reserve Bank's Survey of
Consumer Finances, which defines net worth as all of a family's assets minus all their debts.
http://money.cnn.com/2015/12/09/news/economy/middle-class/index.html

Friday, December 4, 2015

Wal-Mart worker fired after 18 years

If you work at Walmart and you have any trouble / issues not being resolved
please contact the NLRB and let them know what is going on at the Walmart
you work at. Walmart is too damn big to play games at work.
As a worker you need to take care of yourself they won't take care of you!

If your hours are being cut please contact the NLRB in DC, not
the one in your state! Because of how big Walmart is!
And let them know whats going on!
Walmart makes too much money to cut your hours. Please stand up for yourself!
These are times where you need no cuts!
https://www.nlrb.gov  Phone 1-866-667-NLRB


Any issues in my area contact me. E-Mail is listed on my profile here!
https://www.blogger.com/profile/00196802151725092225
http://walmartramen.blogspot.com/2015/08/walmart-cutting-hours-to-save-money-and.html

~~~~~Wal-Mart worker fired after 18 years for turning in $350 cash found in 
Niskayuna store parking lot too slowly
Michael Walsh of Schenectady, a Wal-Mart maintenance worker for 18 years,
was fired on Nov. 6, a few days after he turned in $350 in cash he found in the
parking lot of the Wal-Mart Neighborhood Market.

He was called into a manager's office, interrogated and terminated for
"gross misconduct."His offense? He waited about 30 minutes before he
turned in the money.

"The only thing I did wrong was hesitate," Walsh said, who is 45.
"I didn't steal anything. They didn't give me any warning. They just fired me."

The firing happened on the same day that Thomas Smith, 52, of Albany, an
East Greenbush Wal-Mart employee, was fired for redeeming $2 worth of cans
and bottles left behind in a shopping cart.

Worker rights advocates are organizing a Wal-Mart boycott through Jan. 1 and
additional East Greenbush store demonstrations in response to Smith's
controversial termination.

In the Niskayuna incident, a manager at the store, located on State Street in
Mansion Square, said Tuesday she could not discuss Walsh's firing. A
Wal-Mart spokesman, Aaron Mullins, said he had no comment.

Walsh said he found a $5 bill in the parking lot and immediately went inside and
turned it over to a manager. When he went back outside his job involved picking
up garbage and collecting stray shopping carts he found a small stack of bills,
$20s and $10s, in the parking lot. It was not in an envelope and bore no identification.

He completed his task and when he got a moment, he counted the cash: $350.
He stuffed it in his pants pocket. He went back inside the store, which is adjacent
to a Berkshire Bank branch, and was about to turn in the bundle when he heard
a commotion.

"A woman was yelling at a manager, freaking out that she lost her money and
I got nervous," said Walsh, who speaks haltingly and has anxiety issues.
"I kind of froze and didn't want any trouble."

Walsh returned to his job, which included cleaning the bathrooms,
and he gave a manager the $350 in cash about 30 minutes after he found it.
The manager took the money and Walsh heard nothing more.

Two days later, a manager showed him a surveillance tape that was time-stamped
and confirmed that roughly 30 minutes elapsed from the time a camera captured
Walsh's discovery of the cash and when he turned it in.

"They didn't let me explain and said they knew what happened.
They told me how it happened in a way they wanted it to go," Walsh said.
He was told to sign a statement, but was not given a copy. He was told to turn in his
badge and his employee 10 percent discount card.
He was fired for "gross misconduct."

Walsh, who has a general equivalency diploma from Mont Pleasant High School in
Schenectady, worked at the Glenville Wal-Mart for 10 years and other Wal-Mart stores
in the area before being shifted to the Niskayuna store. It's one-quarter the size of a
standard Wal-Mart Supercenter and includes a grocery, pharmacy, deli and bakery.

"I enjoyed my job, I was a good employee and always got to work on time," he said.
"I got treated like a common criminal."

In all his years as a Wal-Mart worker, including computer-based training,
Walsh said he never received a handbook of employee rules or company policy about
items found in the parking lot.

Walsh got a raise in September to $14.35 an hour, near a $15 cap for a maintenance
worker. He was a full-time employee who worked 40 hours per week.

The timing of his firing also upset Walsh because he lost out on his 20 percent employee
holiday discount and fell short of a coveted 10 percent lifetime discount card for
20-year employees.

"I was really looking forward to that lifetime discount card in two more years.
They took that from me," Walsh said.

Without a paycheck, he is struggling to pay his $680 monthly rent and car payment.
His wife is on disability for anxiety and depression.

"I got scared and didn't go about returning the money in the right way," he said.
"I told them I was sorry. I thought they would have given me a warning or suspended me.
Instead, they just fired me."

He has applied for maintenance jobs at Target, Lowe's, BJ's, ShopRite and Ellis Hospital.
Meanwhile, Smith was hired by a local property maintenance company at $12 an hour,
$3 more than his Wal-Mart wage.
http://www.timesunion.com/local/article/Boycott-begun-against-Wal-Mart-in-support-of-6667590.php

Walmart Cutting hours to save money and takes losses to make sales

Walmart is cutting workers hours at some Walmarts.
"Walmart says the cutbacks are only at a small fraction of its stores and are 
unrelated to the higher labor costs."

But yet the cutbacks being "a small fraction of it's stores" you need to note 
Walmart will take losses to make a sale! Many small businesses can't do what 
Walmart does so they go away. Thus the issue with Sprawl http://sprawl-busters.com
If Walmart takes a hit with the prices being over all, would be a massive amount vs 
wages cuts, and noted why small stores could not keep up being the lack of ability match 
Walmarts cuts in prices. Why is Walmart not taking a hit with wages being a 
small fraction? More workers working is more to the Revenue Per Employee value.
That is $220,737 per employee revenue by the way!
Keep in mind Walmart is pushing the $500 billion sales.
$485.65B Sales/Revenue and $120.57B Gross Income.
and note it's going up, up, up! 

Saving money on the labor cost is not an issue with the sales growth year after year.
The stock market takes hits from time to time and still grows! Walmart is not a bubble!
$485 billion sales $120 billion gross is not a bubble! There is no need for a drop of hours!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stock_market_bubble

If your hours are being cut please contact the NLRB in DC, not
the one in your state! Because of how big Walmart is!
And let them know whats going on and what I said up there.
Walmart makes too much money to cut your hours. Please stand up for yourself!
These are times where you need no cuts!
https://www.nlrb.gov  Phone 1-866-667-NLRB

Workers information is at:
http://www.dol.gov
https://www.osha.gov

And many others at: ( ( ( ( WORKER RIGHTS, WORK RELATED ) ) ) )
http://dugbuglinks.homestead.com/files/WEBLINKS.html 

Wednesday, December 2, 2015

The Grandma who went for a Walk, Appalachian Trail

It's good that women stand up and get out. It's a pursuit of happiness valued as such!
Find those things that make you happy and grab them by the horns!

~~~~~The Grandma who went for a Walk Alone through 14 States
At the age of 67, Emma Rowena Gatewood told her adult children she was going out 
for a walk. Little did they know that her “walk” would make her the first woman to hike 
the 2,168-mile Appalachian Trail from Mount Oglethorpe in Georgia to Mount Katahdin in 
Maine solo, and in one season. She was a farmer’s wife from Ohio, a mother to 11 children 
who gave her 24 grandchildren, and a survivor of domestic violence.

In 1950, Emma had read an article in the National Geographic about the famous trail, 
which she would later find out had greatly exaggerated the ease of the hike, giving her
the impression of leisurely walks and clean cabins at the end of each stretch. In 1955,
when she decided to embark on her little impromptu stroll, she wore Keds tennis
shoes and packed barely any hiking gear normally required except for a blanket,
raincoat and a plastic shower curtain. As people began spotting the 67 year-old
grandmother making her way alone through forests and wild lands on the longest
hiking-only trail in the world,local newspapers picked up on the story.
Nicknamed “Grandma Gatewood”, by the time she had reached Connecticut,
Sports Illustrated had done an article on her and she became a celebrity before the
hike was even over.

There’s a tradition along the Appalachian Trail for some hikers to receive “trail magic”,
assistance from strangers living along the route in the form of anonymous kind actions,
gifts, food or places to sleep. As Grandma Gatewood’s celebrity grew with every state
she conquered, more strangers encouraged her with “trail magic”.

This remarkable farmer’s wife from Ohio had always found solace in nature,
ever since her husband began physically beating her on a regular basis just a few
weeks into their marriage. On more than one occasion, he had nearly beaten her to death,
breaking her ribs and teeth, threatening to have her committed to an insane asylum if she
tried to leave him.

When she needed to escape their marital home, Emma often ran into the woods to
find peace. Eventually, she was able to get a divorce, but never re-married,
content in her solitude and confident she could take care of herself.

When she completed her 14-state two thousand-mile hike, Mrs. Gatewood was
invited on the Today Show to speak about her experience.
“For some fool reason, they always lead you right up over the biggest rock to
the top of the biggest mountain they can find”.

When asked for hiking tips, she said, “Make a rain cape, and an over the shoulder sling
bag, and buy a sturdy pair of Keds tennis shoes. Stop at local groceries and pick up
Vienna sausages… most everything else to eat you can find beside the trail”.

By the age of 75, she had hiked the Appalachian Trail three times, making her the
first person to do so. She also walked the 2,000 mile Oregon Trail from Missouri
to Oregon averaging 22 miles a day and traveled to every state in the country
during her lifetime.
http://www.messynessychic.com/2015/11/26/the-grandma-who-went-for-a-walk-alone-through-14-states

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grandma_Gatewood

RadioShack starting up WOMPA!

Believe it or not I always did my X-mas shopping at RadioShack back in the days.
In the 1990's I went to RadioShack to get some resistors switches etc to make a
speedometer bypass for my 1990 Nissan 240sx so I could bypass the speedometer
and make it run with the resistors making the cars ECU think it was only doing
100 MPH when it was really doing 156 MPH! Thanks RadioShack!
* It's normally speed governed at 116 MPH!

Anyway... RadioShack is coming back! They have hired Nick Cannon as
chief creative officer. This is good being the directed creativity he will bring!
"RadioShack said Cannon will also play a role in developing its educational and 
S.T.E.M. products. The line consists of items meant to foster learning in science, 
technology, engineering and math."
http://money.cnn.com/2015/12/02/news/companies/nick-cannon-radioshack-chief-creative-officer/index.html

*I would advise schools to jump in being a reasonable resource it will be!

~~~~~RadioShack starts “wild ‘n out,” hires actor/rapper Nick Cannon as CCO
If you've seen actor, rapper, America's Got Talent host, and TeenNick chairman
Nick Cannon in the news lately, you might have assumed it was due to his performance
in an upcoming Spike Lee joint about violence in Chicago's south side.
But on Wednesday, the entertainer had news from an entirely different dimension
when he announced that he had added another feather to his not-quite-Pharrell-sized hat:
chief creative officer at RadioShack.

Does this "hire" mean anything more than seeing Cannon's face on advertisements,
as has been the case with many other major tech company celebrity hires?
RadioShack certainly wants us to think so, as the company's announcement gave a vague
list of Cannon's CCO duties, the biggest of which appears to be the "development of
RadioShack-exclusive products." Cannon will also be tasked with in-store music curation,
event promotion, and helping the company "continue to grow" its educational and
STEM-specific initiatives. RadioShack didn't specify what existing educational initiatives
it is running, and its home page currently offers no official information about such initiatives.

The announcement did recall a story from Cannon's youth, in which he broke a stereo that
he'd taken apart then went to a RadioShack in his home of San Diego to get help fixing it
where he eventually figured out how to assemble and modify his own sound systems.
(In other interviews, Cannon has boasted that as a kid, he'd figured out how to
connect telephones to turntables and "make hold music.")

"RadioShack is a brand that matters," Cannon said in the announcement.
"As a kid, spending time in my neighborhood RadioShack was invaluable.
The maker mentality and educational approach taught me a lot and encouraged
me to explore my own creativity. In return I wanted to give back by fostering creative
pursuits in others, and helping kids move to the next level."

However, while Cannon has launched tech ventures over the past few years, the results
have spoken less to RadioShack's maker mentality and more to its modern, suffering
incarnation, including budget-priced tablets sold on QVC and Beats-like headphones.
Cannon previously served as an "entertainment ambassador" for the annual
Consumer Electronics Show, apparently to promote a line of "Ncredible" tablets.
Those devices included a built-in multimedia sharing app designed to let aspiring 
entertainers pitch their acts directly to Cannon's production company.
(As of press time, the official Ncredible site's online store wouldn't load.)

Until today, the last major announcement about the state of RadioShack 
(after its filing for bankruptcy and delisting from the NYSE earlier this year, that is) 
came in July when the company was acquired by General Wireless for $26.2 million.
WOMPA!

Fortuna and The Wheel of Fortune



With me I hope Luck, Fate, and Fortune will come knocking at my door. Oh please!
But in life you can only hope for the best and want the best for others.
Be supportive where you can and let them know your door is open!

~~~~~Fortuna & The Wheel of Fortune
In The Merchant of Venice, Portia, an affluent and quick-witted heiress from 
Belmont, aids in rescuing Antonio from his legal plight with Shylock. 
The fates of people around Portia shift constantly, while her situation generally 
improves without problem. Portia’s actions through the play embody Fortuna’s 
whimsical interest in humanity.

In order to compare Portia and Fortuna, we need a little background on
this mythical figure and her famous wheel. In Roman mythology, Fortuna was the
goddess of Luck, Fate, and Fortune. She watched over the fate of the individual as well
as the state. In her left hand, Fortuna usually held a cornucopia, a symbol of all
good things flowing in abundance. In the other hand, Fortuna held a ship’s rudder,
which implied her power to steer the delicate lives of mortals. By using both objects,
she was able to either bring happiness to the person’s life, or completely destroy the
 individual’s life instead.

Associated with Fortuna was her Rota Fortunae (Latin for “wheel of fortune”), which
was a medieval concept that involved the use of a wheel that a person symbolically rode
during his or her life. At the top of the wheel, a person’s lifestyle was full of happiness
and leisure. A individual at this level would live like a king. However, the wheel would
eventually rotate and the person would begin to endure  a miserable existence, full of pain
and tragedy. Someone at the bottom hoped that Fortuna would eventually spin her wheel
often enough for the individual to come back on top, both metaphorically and financially.

Portia, true to her allegorical figure, jumps at the opportunity to rescue Antonio
from Shylock during the trial scene, spotting it as a situation where she can spin her
metaphorical wheel and dramatically alter the fates of the people involved.
By indirectly offering to pay more than triple the amount Bassiano borrowed from
Shylock, Portia’s act symbolizes the cornucopia in Fortuna’s left hand.
The parallel between Portia and Fortuna also shows up in the last scene of the play.
After revealing that she had been the lawyer during the trial in Venice, Portia hands
Antonio a sealed letter:

“Unseal this letter soon; There you shall found three of your argosies,
Are richly come to harbor suddenly. You shall not know by what strange accident,
I chanced on this letter.” (V.I.295-297)

Portia claims to have discovered the news herself without any external help,
which leads me to see a further connection between her and the concept of Fortuna.
Antonio, whose ships disappeared through fortune, is finally rewarded with the return of
his ships after the terrible trial with Shylock. Maybe Fortuna’s wheels rotated even
more for Antonio, elevating him to an even higher level of wealth because his ships came
back to harbor. Like the rudder in Fortuna’s hands, Portia’s letter embodies Fortuna’s
jurisdiction over a mortal’s life.
https://sites.dartmouth.edu/exploratoryshakespeare/2015/07/14/fortuna-the-wheel-of-fortune

Monday, November 30, 2015

Low pay gives you nothing and as it is!

No matter who you are you have to accept it for the better of the good!
The way of life is a naturistic policy and if you just stand there you get ran over.

I talk about this a lot. If the wages goes up everything else will follow.
And the need for the pay to go up, mostly noted the fact that small towns
have nothing vs a bigger city. Basically noticed in the growth of Tulsa Oklahoma.
A place that has bumped up the pay vs a small town that keeps the
pay at their lowest. Small towns are in their way trying to grow to get around
not matching inflation as small towns wages are stagnant and so is the growth.
You can make it but can people afford it? Low wages keeps small towns down!

There is a such a divide rich and poor retail stores have to cater to both parties.
And that is depressing when you go into a store that does that being
it shows the divide in a bad light. My town is making a ALDI store for the rich
in town that don't want to go to Walmart to mingle with all the poor people!
There is too much hoopla to shop there and it's a way to screen out the poor
being they are too lazy to do it. In fact I say to the poor get in there and shop,
flood the place!

Also bad in a sociological view as the wages are low and life is low from that so
comes in the bottom of barrel workers. It's a fact of life you get what you pay for.
And where there is such a divide rich towns vs poor towns you get this more, it's
a fact of life and really should not be ignored! It shows the need to raise the pay to
keep it's ugly head from popping up. Such a divide causes the action of people
that want better pay being they like to buy food and pay their bills to work
at the better paying jobs. And will work at those places leaving the bad workers,
pushing the bad workers to lower income towns.

If you took a sociology class you might of learned
"There is a reason people work for the low pay, because they
can't make anywhere else." That normally a small issue but in a divide of richer
vs poorer things get massively worse! There is nothing bad with being a
bottom of the barrel, only that there would be so many in one spot
and if they expect you to live in the bottom of it also!



Pushing productivity (Productivity harassment!) is just harassing the workers being
the sales they want is just dust in the wind to the broke people that buys less.
And is like the do more with less of making your workers panic.
It's just shows a bad manager that failed and has to harass the workers to
get more done from the fail! Give the fail is also from the towns people being broke.

All of that points the wages do need to go up if you want anything in your town.
And... The fact many want nothing in town. Being they are sadomasochist voters.
Like it's noted in Oklahoma why people vote against their best interest.
Because they like it! And it does make others a victim from that practice,
like a nice car in the Walmart parking lot with a note stuck on it
"Sorry my bad!" Or like being in the quick sand with people that want to go down
in it with a few that want to do better. They can't they are in quick sand!
Well small towns are hell. Live in a small town welcome to hell!
It helps to understand this so you kind of know whats going on!

The point is all of this hell would be covered up with better pay.
It's just the wages are not matching inflation and the bottom of the iceberg
is exposed more than it should be! Better pay makes better people.
Progress runs over the sadomasochist voters that like it bad.
America can't live like they do. I mean if they did all we would have
in America would be a corn field. How bright would that light be?
Like in history we would be invaded easy. By Canada I hope!

Or noted as it's sad to be a victim of natural selection to roll with
the slow progress of it. As I see in my town people letting their homes rot.
In the end the house will fall over or they have to get out of the black mold trap.
There are more homes falling apart than they are tearing down in my town,
I noticed it lately. Nature is taking back it's land with no effort to stop it.
If they had better pay they could afford to fix their homes!

Anyway you see it the pay does need to go up in small towns.
All you really have to look at the growth in Tulsa from the better pay
to see the difference. If you are a sadomasochist and like it bad
then you make it bad for everyone else. Also it gives the town the bottom
of the barrel more than it should! With no change it's going to get worse in
small towns.

Many of the poor are "heavily in debt." in their car payment they had the last
10 years from refinancing the loan skipping payments.
Many just voluntary repossess the car to get rid of it not caring about
their credit history as it takes money to have credit, you have to buy stuff!
And many have their paycheck garnished, pay alimony leaving them to live
on half their paycheck. In that makes work places not willing to hire them
being they might steal at the work place because they would be hungry
and living on $4.50 after taxes etc. Garnishment & Alimony is a called a debt.
That is what workplaces look at to not hire people. What risk are they to the store.
http://money.cnn.com/2015/12/01/news/economy/america-poor-in-debt/index.html

And I hope it shows the need to raise the pay for the better of the good!

 ~~~~~Minimum Wage Mythbusters  Dol.gov
Myth: Raising the minimum wage will only benefit teens.
Not true: The typical minimum wage worker is not a high school student earning weekend pocket money. In fact, 89 percent of those who would benefit from a federal minimum wage increase to $12 per hour are age 20 or older, and 56 percent are women.


Myth: Increasing the minimum wage will cause people to lose their jobs.
Not true: In a letter to President Obama and congressional leaders urging a minimum wage increase, more than 600 economists, including 7 Nobel Prize winners wrote, "In recent years there have been important developments in the academic literature on the effect of increases in the minimum wage on employment, with the weight of evidence now showing that increases in the minimum wage have had little or no negative effect on the employment of minimum-wage workers, even during times of weakness in the labor market. Research suggests that a minimum-wage increase could have a small stimulative effect on the economy as low-wage workers spend their additional earnings, raising demand and job growth, and providing some help on the jobs front."


Myth: Small business owners can't afford to pay their workers more, and therefore don't support an increase in the minimum wage.
Not true: A July 2015 survey found that 3 out of 5 small business owners with employees support a gradual increase in the minimum wage to $12. The survey reports that small business owners say an increase "would immediately put more money in the pocket of low-wage workers who will then spend the money on things like housing, food, and gas. This boost in demand for goods and services will help stimulate the economy and help create opportunities."


Myth: Raising the federal tipped minimum wage ($2.13 per hour since 1991) would hurt restaurants.
Not true: In California, employers are required to pay servers the full minimum wage of $9 per hour — before tips. Even with a 2014 increase in the minimum wage, the National Restaurant Association projects California restaurant sales will outpace all but only a handful of states in 2015.


Myth: Raising the federal tipped minimum wage ($2.13 per hour since 1991) would lead to restaurant job losses.
Not true: As of May 2015, employers in San Francisco must pay tipped workers the full minimum wage of $12.25 per hour — before tips. Yet, the San Francisco leisure and hospitality industry, which includes full-service restaurants, has experienced positive job growth this year, including following the most recent minimum wage increase.


Myth: Raising the federal minimum wage won't benefit workers in states where the hourly minimum rate is already higher than the federal minimum.
Not true: While 29 states and the District of Columbia currently have a minimum wage higher than the federal minimum, increasing the federal minimum wage will boost the earnings for nearly 38 million low-wage workers nationwide. That includes workers in those states already earning above the current federal minimum. Raising the federal minimum wage is an important part of strengthening the economy. A raise for minimum wage earners will put more money in more families' pockets, which will be spent on goods and services, stimulating economic growth locally and nationally.


Myth: Younger workers don't have to be paid the minimum wage.
Not true: While there are some exceptions, employers are generally required to pay at least the federal minimum wage. Exceptions allowed include a minimum wage of $4.25 per hour for young workers under the age of 20, but only during their first 90 consecutive calendar days of employment with an employer, and as long as their work does not displace other workers. After 90 consecutive days of employment or the employee reaches 20 years of age, whichever comes first, the employee must receive the current federal minimum wage or the state minimum wage, whichever is higher. There are programs requiring federal certification that allow for payment of less than the full federal minimum wage, but those programs are not limited to the employment of young workers.


Myth: Restaurant servers don't need to be paid the minimum wage since they receive tips.
Not true: An employer can pay a tipped employee as little as $2.13 per hour in direct wages, but only if that amount plus tips equal at least the federal minimum wage and the worker retains all tips and customarily and regularly receives more than $30 a month in tips. Often, an employee's tips combined with the employer's direct wages of at least $2.13 an hour do not equal the federal minimum hourly wage. When that occurs, the employer must make up the difference. Some states have minimum wage laws specific to tipped employees. When an employee is subject to both the federal and state wage laws, he or she is entitled to the provisions of each law which provides the greater benefits.


Myth: Increasing the minimum wage is bad for businesses.
Not true: Academic research has shown that higher wages sharply reduce employee turnover which can reduce employment and training costs.


Myth: Increasing the minimum wage is bad for the economy.
Not true: Since 1938, the federal minimum wage has been increased 22 times. For more than 75 years, real GDP per capita has steadily increased, even when the minimum wage has been raised.


Myth: The federal minimum wage goes up automatically as prices increase.
Not true: While some states have enacted rules in recent years triggering automatic increases in their minimum wages to help them keep up with inflation, the federal minimum wage does not operate in the same manner. An increase in the federal minimum wage requires approval by Congress and the president. However, in his call to gradually increase the current federal minimum, President Obama has also called for it to adjust automatically with inflation. Eliminating the requirement of formal congressional action would likely reduce the amount of time between increases, and better help low-income families keep up with rising prices.


Myth: The federal minimum wage is higher today than it was when President Reagan took office.
Not true: While the federal minimum wage was only $3.35 per hour in 1981 and is currently $7.25 per hour in real dollars, when adjusted for inflation, the current federal minimum wage would need to be more than $8 per hour to equal its buying power of the early 1980s and more nearly $11 per hour to equal its buying power of the late 1960s. That's why President Obama is urging Congress to increase the federal minimum wage and give low-wage workers a much-needed boost.


Myth: Increasing the minimum wage lacks public support.
Not true: Raising the federal minimum wage is an issue with broad popular support. Polls conducted since February 2013 when President Obama first called on Congress to increase the minimum wage have consistently shown that an overwhelming majority of Americans support an increase.


Myth: Increasing the minimum wage will result in job losses for newly hired and unskilled workers in what some call a “last-one-hired-equals-first-one-fired” scenario.
Not true: Minimum wage increases have little to no negative effect on employment as shown in independent studies from economists across the country. Academic research also has shown that higher wages sharply reduce employee turnover which can reduce employment and training costs.


Myth: The minimum wage stays the same if Congress doesn't change it.
Not true: Congress sets the minimum wage, but it doesn't keep pace with inflation. Because the cost of living is always rising, the value of a new minimum wage begins to fall from the moment it is set.

http://www.dol.gov/minwage/mythbuster.htm

My Nissan Versa Deer Crash 2024 - Sole Survivor

Back in 2024 coming home from work on the expressway the speed limit was 80 MPH and so I ended up hitting a deer that was running across the...