Can Burning Man Culture Spark Political Change? Needs to!

In these times. With many Republicans wanting us to be a island
Trumps travel ban, Cutting medicaid, food stamps keeping the pay low 
so the people are wasting all of their time trying to make a living.
So they don't live! Yes there needs to be change!

We are many in such few people! Did you know the worlds population is only
size of Los Angeles shoulder to shoulder out of the whole planet!
Population control and others are just fear mongering!

"Standing shoulder-to-shoulder, the entire world's population could fit within the
500 square miles (1,300 square kilometers) of Los Angeles."
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2011/10/111031-population-7-billion-earth-world-un-seven

Where did you come from? Your family? You need to ask!
It's better to not fear monger about others. Stop the xenophobia!

Me? My family is mostly!
Africa -- less than 1%:
Northern Africa -- less than 1%

Europe -- 97%:
Great Britain -- 50%
Europe West -- 35%
Ireland -- 8%
Finland/Northwest Russia -- 1%
Iberian Penisula -- 1%
Europe East -- less than 1%
Scandinavia -- less than 1%

West Asia -- 2%:
Caucaus -- 1%
Middle East -- less than 1%

And I am Polyamorous!

War Mongering? Wars? Why really!
People all over the world don't care about wars, really
wars come out of fears! The people don't really care about
wars. "It's their war not mine..." 
Why have wars just send the disputing
presidents to a island to fight it out. Don't bring the people into
their war the people are busy wondering about the Wi-Fi...
Connecting together!

"I keep hearing this fucking thing that guns don't kill people, 
but people kill people. If that's the case, why do we give people guns 
when they go to war? Why not just send the people?" - Ozzy Osbourne
http://www.goodreads.com/quotes/705420-i-keep-hearing-this-fucking-thing-that-guns-don-t-kill

So these days it's best to think about things and get a grip!

https://burningman.org

Teacher accountability and the illiterate

In high stakes testing, holding Teachers accountable is not in reality
as there are other factors that change it's effect.
As one bad kid holds back the whole class. It's all connected.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-stakes_testing

Like when I was in college in the 90's, whenever a kid walks in
the class with a cowboy hat on with a stupid face the whole class
says shit! They know he will hold back the whole class because
he doesn't have a clue what is going on and the college professor
has to spend more time on him to bring him up to speed because
the stupid kid will be asking questions the whole time in class.
That is not fair to the other kids that paid something like $500
for the class seeing their time and money go away!!!

A college instructor I had once, stopped class and took off to the
Deans office to complain about a kid being unprepared for college.
"He's holding back the whole class send him back to high school!"

So in high stakes testing holding Teachers accountable one needs
to ask what if a Teacher has a illiterate kid walk in their class?
The Teacher now knows the kid won't pass the testing and rains havoc
for the Teacher. It would be ethical for the Teacher to just grab their 
stuff and quit, being the mind set of a failed high stakes testing model.

Well it's not fair to Teachers in small towns as the literacy rate is lower
because of the town not being brought up yet!
You make nothing so you have nothing. They are uneducated because they
can't afford it. It's like credit, it takes money to have credit you have to
buy something! "You can make it, but they can't afford it!"
Education cost money and you get what you pay for.
This is why parents want their kid to go to Harvard and not a JR College.
Their kid makes more money in life from Harvard than a JR College!

A point of natural selection thus cleansing the gene pool
having illiterate kids walk in to the class going for high stakes testing.
No! The Teacher and kids are brought down to their level also.

So with that in mind is why for me I look at Personalized Learning.

-----In the diverse and ever-changing world of educational technology, the term "personalized learning" seems to be everywhere, though there is not yet a shared understanding of what it means.

Many school officials, and companies scrambling to do business with them, use that omnipresent phrase to refer to efforts to tailor lessons to students of different ability levels an appealing concept, given the pressures schools face to raise the achievement of students coming to academic topics from very different starting points.
http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2014/10/22/09pl-overview.h34.html

Different starting points, as seen as a illiterate people walking in the class
holding the class back. No just work on them personalized because the kids have
different backgrounds.

Income is a factor and points that the income, minimum wage does
need to be raised. You get what you pay for!
http://walmartramen.blogspot.com/2017/07/income-crucial-role-in-determining.html

Adam and Eve You're My Sister, You're My Sister!

For those people that never thought of it in the light of today in how we live.
And how life is in holy roller towns and thinking they are better than you are.

I was wondering if they knew that being everything started with Adam and Eve,
and everything from that is like Married couples or couples having sex with
their brother or sister being we all came from Adam and Eve, or something like it.

You are having sex with your sister or brother! And also we all are inbred as we all
came from the same beginning!

We are all inbred and having sex with your sister or brother!
And isn't it about time people face the truth! We are all connected!

~~~~~“Runs of homozygosity” or ROH are regions of the genome where 
the copies inherited from our parents are identical. This creates a run of 
homozygous variants, from tens of thousands to millions of letters in length. 
The two DNA copies are identical because our parents have inherited them 
from a common ancestor at some point in the past, recently in the case of a 
cousin marriage, but in fact we all carry ROH, because going
far enough back in time we are all related.

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0013996

Vivienne Haigh-Wood, Bertrand Russell, Polyamory, Healer

Bertrand Russell a healer? All relationships have a purpose good or bad!
Lovers, love. "That powerful, universal, governing force is love." - Albert Einstein 
And so is on a different plane. 

Love is stable if it makes one unstable then it's not much of a love!
Accepting the better because it would be for the better is called healing!
Bertrand Russell was acting real for the time!

A menage a trois in the 1900's was a common thing in those days.
It needs to be looked at as on a different plane, spiritual as for the healing! 
There was a reason for them. In the same manner of Polyamory today.
 A menage a trois does not mean sex only a point to have balance in a unbalanced
situation! It's for the better of the good!
"They accepted an offer from Bertrand Russell, then leader of the peace 
movement, to move into his flat, and set up a menage a trois."

"Vivienne ruined Tom as a man, but she made him as a poet."
Yes and no depending if tom ruined himself as his issues and 
failure to adapt to Vivienne's needs overwhelmed him. 
And if it was the same for Vivienne.

In these days more light is pushed in Polyamory in being on a level
plane. Jealousy is something that is talked about.
It's like a test you can't take the test unless you have it.
But you must take the test knowing why and who it is for!
Love should be healing for all as love stabilizes. 

Bertrand Russell also had connections with Lady Ottoline Morrell,
the actress Lady Constance Malleson and Vivienne Haigh-wood.
"He soon fell in love with the puritanical, high-minded Alys, who was a graduate
of Bryn Mawr College near Philadelphia, and, contrary to his grandmother's wishes,
married her on 13 December 1894. Their marriage began to fall apart in 1901
when it occurred to Russell, while he was cycling, that he no longer loved her.
She asked him if he loved her and he replied that he didn't.

Russell also disliked Alys's mother, finding her controlling and cruel.
It was to be a hollow shell of a marriage and they finally divorced in 1921,
after a lengthy period of separation.
During this period, Russell had passionate (and often simultaneous) affairs with
a number of women, including Lady Ottoline Morrell and the actress
Lady Constance Malleson. Some have suggested that at this point he had an affair
with Vivienne Haigh-Wood, the English governess and writer, and first wife of
T. S. Eliot.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bertrand_Russell#University_and_first_marriage

"In all affairs it's a healthy thing now and then to hang a question mark on the
things you have long taken for granted."

"The secret of happiness is this: let your interests be as wide as possible,
and let your reactions to the things and persons that interest you be as far
as possible friendly rather than hostile."

Also noted, the life changing read of the Chapters.
The Conquest of Happiness (1930) is a book by Bertrand Russell.
http://russell-j.com/beginner/COH-TEXT.HTM

Lady Ottoline Morrell:
"In February 1902, she married the MP Philip Morrell, with whom she shared a
passion for art and a strong interest in Liberal politics. They shared what would
now be known as an open marriage for the rest of their lives."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lady_Ottoline_Morrell

Lady Constance Malleson:
"During the First World War, her pacifist opinions brought her into contact with
Bertrand Russell, whose mistress she soon became
(having agreed with her husband on an "open marriage").
In 1923, she was divorced from Malleson. Her interest in social reform led her
to travel abroad, and she carried out lecture tours in Scandinavia in the
1930s and 1940s."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lady_Constance_Malleson

Vivienne Haigh-Wood:
Haigh-Wood met Eliot in Oxford in March 1915, while he was studying philosophy at Merton College and she was working as a governess in Cambridge. They were married in Hampstead Register Office three months later. They remained married until her death in 1947, but Haigh-Wood's poor physical and mental health, and Eliot's apparent intolerance of it, produced a stormy relationship, made worse by her apparently having an affair with the philosopher Bertrand Russell.

Eliot arranged for a formal separation in February 1933, and thereafter shunned her entirely, hiding from her and instructing his friends – including members of the Bloomsbury Group and the publisher Faber & Faber, where he was a director – not to tell her where he was. Her brother had her committed to an asylum in 1938, after she was found wandering the streets of London at five o'clock in the morning, apparently asking whether Eliot had been beheaded. Apart from one escape attempt, she remained there until she died nine years later at the age of 58; she was said to have suffered a heart attack, although there is a suspicion that she took an overdose. Eliot won the Nobel Prize for Literature the following year.

Carole Seymour-Jones writes that it was out of the turmoil of the marriage that Eliot produced The Waste Land, one of the 20th century's finest poems. Eliot's sister-in-law, Theresa, said of the relationship: "Vivienne ruined Tom as a man, but she made him as a poet."
(But noted the issues he had was his issues.)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vivienne_Haigh-Wood

~~~~~Not crazy after all these years
Why did T. S. Eliot have wife Vivienne committed? She was definitely not mad, argues Carole Seymour-Jones

On her death in January 1947, Vivienne Eliot left her papers to the Bodleian Library, Oxford, in order to preserve the record of her tempestuous 17-year marriage to the poet T. S. Eliot. She wrote in her diary that she longed for people to know the "true history" of her relationship with her husband. In a letter to her friend Lady Ottoline Morrell, she claimed that, "the truth will all come out, if not in our life, then after it".

Vivienne had become a phantom-like figure on the fringe of Eliot's life. She was written out of his biography and literary history. After he deserted her in 1933, he did all he could to avoid her. But Vivienne found separation impossible to accept. She became a lonely, neurotic figure, ostracised by the Bloomsbury Group, rebuffed when she called at Faber and Faber, where Eliot was a director, and hissed at by the audience when she attended her husband's plays wearing her British Union of Fascists uniform.

Although Vivienne attempted to rebuild her life, studying at the Royal Academy of Music, her "perpetual anxiety", as she told her bank manager, was to shadow Tom. From his point of view, she had become a stalker. On November 18 1935, the public confrontation that Eliot had sought so long to avoid took place at The Sunday Times Book Fair. Once again Vivienne chose to wear her Fascist uniform, a black beret and a large black mackintosh cape. A small fierce dramatic figure, she strode in, holding her dog, Polly, and some books she had brought him to sign. As Eliot finished speaking, she mounted the platform and approached him. "I said quietly, 'Will you come back with me?'", she recalled in her diary. "I cannot talk to you now," Eliot replied.

In June 1935, the first attempt to commit Vivienne to a mental institution was made, but she answered her doctors' questions lucidly, and they declined to sign the order. She adopted a false name, Daisy Miller, from Henry James's eponymous story, in an attempt to hide from Tom, as he had done so successfully from her on his return from the United States in 1933. She too, she wrote, would live two lives, like the Theban seer Tiresias. But Vivienne was no match for Macavity. In July 1938, the doctors returned. This time they were strangers and Vivienne was committed to Northumberland House, Finsbury Park.

When Vivienne's brother Maurice Haigh-Wood, who had colluded in her committal, visited her, he burst into tears. "It was only when I saw Vivie in the asylum for the last time I realised I had done something very wrong," he told Michael Hastings, author of Tom and Viv, in 1980. "She was as sane as I was. What Tom and I did was wrong. I did everything Tom told me to."

Despite having financial motives for committing his sister, Haigh-Wood blamed Tom. Tom blamed himself, too. But guilt did not stop him taking his revenge upon Vivienne. In his 1938 play, The Family Reunion, he describes a wife who is "a restless shivering painted shadow". Virginia Woolf's verdict was equally hostile - "This bag of ferrets is what Tom wears round his neck" - damning Vivienne as T. S. Eliot's own Mrs Rochester, the madwoman in the attic.

The poet's revenge extended even beyond death. The Bodleian Library understood that it owned the copyright on Vivienne's papers, but this was claimed in 1984 by Valerie Eliot, the poet's widow and literary executor, following the production of Tom and Viv. She was acting in accordance with Eliot's wishes, expressed in February 1938 to his previous literary executor, John Hayward, to "suppress everything suppressible". Legal opinion remains divided on the question of copyright, but in effect the second wife was thenceforth able to silence the first.

In Vivienne's archive I encountered a gifted, energetic woman very different from the crazy stereotype. Not only was I touched by Vivienne's poignant love for Tom, but impressed by the couple's close literary partnership - and intrigued by the secrets of his double life. To give Vivienne a voice became my goal.

From the earliest days of their marriage, at Hampstead Register Office on June 26 1915, Vivienne, vivacious daughter of a Royal Academician from Bury, Lancashire, and Tom, brilliant son of a brick manufacturer from St Louis, Missouri, proved physically and temperamentally incompatible.

Yet Vivienne was central to Eliot's life and art. In 1915, she fought to keep him in England, against his parents' wish that he return to teach philosophy at Harvard. Eliot wrote: "She has everything to give that I want, and she gives it. I owe her everything." Vivienne's belief in Tom was unwavering. In 1916, she told his brother Henry: "I look upon Tom's poetry as real genius. I think he is meant to be a great writer - a poet."

Nevertheless, the Eliots were hard-up. Tom's father had cut off his allowance. They accepted an offer from Bertrand Russell, then leader of the peace movement, to move into his flat, and set up a menage a trois.

Although Eliot colluded in Vivienne's seduction by Russell, which provided him with financial and literary benefits, as well as relieving him of conjugal duties, he began to view his wife as a "succuba", a female demon or, in 17th-century slang, a "strumpet" or whore. Brooding in the garden of the house they had rented with Bertie in Marlow, Eliot composed a sardonic poem, which he later suppressed, "Ode on Independence Day, July 4th 1918", in which he expressed his resentment at the entrapment of marriage. A cancelled line refers to "the sullen succuba suspired", Vivienne sighing after the departed Russell, who had just entered Brixton prison. "Mr Apollinax" and "Whispers of Immortality" were also influenced by Vivienne's affair with the satanic Bertie.

The Eliots' marriage continued to be both source and subject of his poetry and drama. The neurotic, co-dependent relationship they shared was the deepest and strongest of the "tentacular roots" of Eliot's work. Although Vivienne had a predisposition to instability, Eliot contributed to that instability by withholding love, and it was this unhappy combination of "Tom and Vivienne", this crucible of dysfunction, that, rather than hindering the poet's creativity, provoked it.

For Vivienne was Tom's muse, the woman he needed in order to transmute life into art. Theresa Eliot, Vivienne's sister-in-law, understood this when she wrote: "Vivienne ruined Tom as a man, but she made him as a poet."

The connection between art and biography is, perhaps, most evident in The Waste Land, completed in 1921 after Tom's breakdown, in a Lausanne psychiatric clinic. "This is Tom's autobiography," exclaimed his friend Mary Hutchinson, although the personal element of the poem had been sacrificed by Ezra Pound in order to make it the justification for the modern movement.

In Switzerland, Eliot remembered with longing his relationship with the young Frenchman he had loved, Jean Verdenal, who once brought him lilacs in the Luxembourg Gardens, and had died in the Dardanelles campaign of April 1915 ("the cruellest month"). Painfully the poet asks his readers to consider Phlebas, the drowned sailor, "who was once handsome and tall as you".

The homosexual interpretation of The Waste Land, advanced in 1952 by critic John Peter and identifying Phlebas with Verdenal, is a convincing one.

By contrast, in "Death of a Duchess", a section of the original 1,000-line manuscript influenced by John Webster's The Duchess of Malfi, the poet expresses his deep misogyny. Like Webster's duchess, who has also made a misalliance, Vivienne cries reproachfully that her husband has cause to love her. "I did enter you in my heart / Before ever you vouchsafed to ask for the key."

The duchess pleads for her life. In Webster's version she is strangled; in Eliot's she is murdered as she turns to "interrogate the silence" behind her.

Cut by Pound, these truncated lines became "A Game of Chess" in The Waste Land, but still mirrored Vivienne's misery. "My nerves are bad to-night. Yes, bad. Stay with me." "Photography" wrote an admiring Pound against the text. Vivienne too wrote "Wonderful", although she asked Tom to delete the line, "The ivory men make company between us," so revealing of marital incompatibility. She added two lines of her own; the first, "What you get married for if you don't want to have children," underlining the Eliots "acute desire for progeny", which Tom later confessed to Hayward.

On one level, Vivienne became no longer Muse but Medusa, the "injur'd bride" in Eliot's unpublished "Elegy", about whose head scorpions hissed: the stuff of his nightmares. But it was this same Vivienne who filled the columns of The Criterion with her journalism, using four different pen names, until her sketch satirising the Bloomsbury Group, "Fete Galante", led to her downfall in 1925.

Sad, eccentric, drug dependent, anorexic: Vivienne became all of these - but none of them was the reason for her incarceration.

(Carole Seymour-Jones was awarded the Paul Mellon visiting fellowship by the University of Texas at Austin in 1999-2000 to research Vivienne Eliot's life at the Harry Ransom Humanities Research Center. She is author of Painted Shadow, published this week by Constable & Robinson, £20.00.)
https://www.timeshighereducation.com/features/not-crazy-after-all-these-years/165448.article

I do see myself as a healer. Currently I am taking care of my ex that is 70+ that had
heart surgery. I'm 48, but I also have feelings for a married gypsy,
a red string of fate, quantum entanglement kind of thing.
So as Bertrand Russell it's noted as, relationships all have a purpose for the 
better of the good! To be the healer because love goes higher!

Bertrand Russell

 

This is a story I should of worked on for a long time.

I know people will say more BS, but really in the 80's in middle school,
I remember my teacher asking me a bunch of questions.
Like What do I think about this and what do you think about that etc.
She was asking me questions that where related to Bertrand Russell.
I was 13 at the time who the hell is Bertrand Russell?
So I didn't know anything about him but she knew of his works.

I had the same view point as Bertrand Russell when I was 13 and
I am talking about right on! We think alike! I think my teacher thought
I was a reincarnation of him. Even though he died after I was born.
Still strange! I agree I do fit in there with Bertrand or he fit in with me,
(metaphysics) but anyway...

~~~~~Bertrand Arthur William Russell, 3rd Earl Russell OM FRS
18 May 1872 – 2 February 1970) was a British philosopher, logician, mathematician,
historian, writer, social critic and political activist. At various points in his life he
considered himself a liberal, a socialist, and a pacifist, but he also admitted that he
had never been any of these in any profound sense. He was born in Monmouthshire
into one of the most prominent aristocratic families in Britain. 

In the early 20th century, Russell led the British "revolt against idealism".
He is considered one of the founders of analytic philosophy along with his
predecessor Gottlob Frege, colleague G. E. Moore, and his protégé Ludwig
Wittgenstein. He is widely held to be one of the 20th century's premier logicians.
With A. N. Whitehead he wrote Principia Mathematica, an attempt to create
a logical basis for mathematics. His philosophical essay "On Denoting" has been
considered a "paradigm of philosophy". His work has had a considerable influence
on logic, mathematics, set theory, linguistics, artificial intelligence, cognitive science,
computer science and philosophy, especially the philosophy of language,
epistemology, and metaphysics.

Russell was a prominent anti-war activist; he championed anti-imperialism
and went to prison for his pacifism during World War I. Later, he campaigned
against Adolf Hitler, then criticised Stalinist totalitarianism, attacked the involvement
of the United States in the Vietnam War, and was an outspoken proponent of
nuclear disarmament. In 1950 Russell was awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature
"in recognition of his varied and significant writings in which he champions
humanitarian ideals and freedom of thought".

~~~~~Philosophy:
Russell is generally credited with being one of the founders of analytic philosophy.
He was deeply impressed by Gottfried Leibniz (1646–1716), and wrote on
every major area of philosophy except aesthetics. He was particularly prolific in the
field of metaphysics, the logic and the philosophy of mathematics, the philosophy
of language, ethics and epistemology. When Brand Blanshard asked Russell
why he didn't write on aesthetics, Russell replied that he didn't know anything
about it, "but that is not a very good excuse, for my friends tell me it has not
deterred me from writing on other subjects".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bertrand_Russell

~~~~~Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy - Bertrand Russell
Bertrand Arthur William Russell (1872–1970) was a British philosopher,
logician, essayist and social critic best known for his work in mathematical logic
and analytic philosophy. His most influential contributions include his championing
of logicism (the view that mathematics is in some important sense reducible to logic),
his refining of Gottlob Frege’s predicate calculus (which still forms the basis of
most contemporary systems of logic), his defense of neutral monism
(the view that the world consists of just one type of substance which is
neither exclusively mental nor exclusively physical), and his theories of
definite descriptions and logical atomism. 

Attempts to sum up Russell’s life have been numerous. One of the more famous
comes from the Oxford philosopher A.J. Ayer. As Ayer writes,
“The popular conception of a philosopher as one who combines universal learning
with the direction of human conduct was more nearly satisfied by Bertrand Russell
than by any other philosopher of our time” (1972a, 127). Another telling comment
comes from the Harvard philosopher W.V. Quine: “I think many of us were drawn
to our profession by Russell’s books. He wrote a spectrum of books for a
graduated public, layman to specialist. We were beguiled by the wit and a sense
of new-found clarity with respect to central traits of reality” (1966c, 657).

Despite such comments, perhaps the most memorable encapsulation of Russell’s life
and work comes from Russell himself. As Russell tells us...

http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/russell

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bertrand_Russell%27s_views_on_philosophy

http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/b/bertrand_russell.html

http://www.quotationspage.com/quotes/Bertrand_Russell

http://bertrandrussell.org

The point of philosophy is to start with something so simple as not to seem worth 

stating, and to end with something so paradoxical that no one will believe it.

Bertrand Russell

That was a point for me when I did my homework or a project I had to do
in middle school. It was hard to do something like that but it sets a foundation
for better writing and understanding in life.

Trump is a Hidden Illiterate?

Well Trump being Illiterate? It fits in with being Illiterate! How?
It's common and does happen that kids today come out of high school
functionally illiterate then from there might go in college and life the same.

Money buys a lot, I am sure it could buy ones way through
college. You can buy what you need!
http://www.happyschools.com/buy-or-bribe-college-admission

https://www.buzzfeed.com/hillaryreinsberg/career-confidential-college-admissions

"Trump spent years trying to brag he earned a much more prestigious Wharton
MBA degree before finally admitting it was an only a BA."

Sort of like doing your master's without a thesis then to pop up like you
are the smartest thing on the block in for it for the money.
Doesn't make it so! It's like going to a "McDonald college" vs Berkeley.

Your education is only worth the paper it's printed on.
And money does buy ways through!

"Drag a hundred-dollar bill through a trailer park, you never know
what you'll find." James Carville
http://izquotes.com/quote/217210

https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-difference-between-doing-your-masters-with-and-without-a-thesis

http://walmartramen.blogspot.com/2016/12/normality-psychosis-butterscotch.html

Anyway you see it, you should recognize an Illiterate.
Even Teachers are saying, Shit he's the president!
They seen many kids like Trump, it fits they see it!

~~~~~Trump's Dirty Little Secret?* *He is a Hidden Illiterate!
“Not ignorance, but the ignorance of ignorance is the death of knowledge.”

(Alfred North Whitehead)

When Samantha Bee had some fun with Trump posing the question, “Can Trump Read?” she hit upon a most inconvenient truth: HE CAN”T!

He READS but only at about a 6th grade level and certainly NOT well enough to process and understand the enormously complex details of running the U.S. Government.

He freely admits he’s “not a reader,” and can only name ONE book, "All Quiet On The Western Front” that he claims he read in the past 20 years. I would wager he cannot remember the author's name though?

What Is a Hidden Illiterate?

www.appliedscholastics.org/…

It explains why he has family members sitting in with him at briefings and meetings. It explains why Ivanka listened in on his call with the President of Argentina. It explains why he hates the Teleprompter and prefers to ad-lib, as he has stated. It explains the never released Transcripts from Fordham University or from the University of PA.

Rumors claim his father bought his way into Fordham University. Why  did he transfer after 2 years?  We do not know but the Wharton Admissions Officer was best friends with older brother Freddie. Trump spent years trying to brag he earned a much more prestigious Wharton MBA degree before finally admitting it was an only a BA.

Fellow students have little to remember:

http://www.thedp.com/…/2…/08/donald-trump-wharton-classmates

One former classmate in an Accounting class remembers, "He rarely showed up to class and “everyone” knew he bought the answers to the final exam. He spent little time on campus preferring to travel back and forth to New York City."

4000 Wharton Alumni, Faculty and current students recoiled and were prompted to write, in July 2016, an open letter to Donald Trump stating “You do not represent us,” in which they collectively denounced Trump and the hatred he “actively endorses.”

BUT-there is nothing in the U.S. Constitution that precludes an ILLITERATE from becoming President.

The requirements are simple : www.presidentsusa.net/… but that does not mean an Illiterate should be POTUS!

Legally to be President one only need to be able to read the speeches people hand you.

Can Trump even do that? The evidence suggests NO! Even his voluminous and incessant tweeting, he admits, comes from his speaking out his comments and one of his staff writes them down.

During the campaigns there were analyses of Trump’s word usage and most experts agreed that Trump’s language was about the 4-5th grade level. Most likely the same level as his reading and comprehension skills.

www.newsweek.com/...

As a Hidden Illiterate Donald J. Trump proudly shows off what an ill-informed, malignant narcissist and pathological LIAR he is! However, a $14 million inheritance buys a lot of other people’s expertise!

As POTUS however, there will be times when he and he alone will have to rapidly analyze, process and comprehend dangerous & critical material and make decisions that affects the lives of millions of people around the world.

Trump is INCOMPETENT & INCAPABLE to be the Leader of the Free World! He should never be allowed anywhere near a nuclear weapon! Before it’s too late we must expose these dangerous facts and keep Trump out of the White House!

Watch carefully & judge for yourself: @FullFrontalSamB gets an A+

**Anyone know a journalist who wants to win a PULITZER?
https://www.dailykos.com/story/2016/11/22/1602677/-Trump-s-Dirty-Little-Secret-He-is-a-Hidden-Illiterate

Light In A Darkened World, Regardless

Know you can't have the good without the bad.
Like in the view what if you time traveled to kill Hitler,
only to come back to find out there was another Hitler that took
his place. Albert Einstein said that powerful, universal, governing
force is love. In that love makes corrections to have love, the good!
http://walmartramen.blogspot.com/2017/01/albert-einstein-that-powerful-universal.html

Something to think about as Trump is doing stupid things.
With people thinking that is ok to act that way!
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/donald-trump-and-the-ku-klux-klan-a-history

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Trump_and_Billy_Bush_recording

Not going to happen there is a correction going on people don't
want to loose what they have and want fairness!

Also corrections rule as in Missouri Republicans Lower St. Louis
Minimum Wage From $10 To $7.70 in that means less spending money
and tax cost to cover the loss of wages. Also sets consumer based pricing
as those poor shut down on sales and prices have to be lower to make the sale.
Minimum wage has not gone up in 10 years so it has no cushion against
inflation. The pay has to go up or no sales in that is a form of natural selection
to businesses that  keep the wages low cleansing the gene pool of bad
businesses in the lack of sales and unskilled, unsupported labor flooding the
job markets. You get what you pay for! It's like burning down the weeds to make
room for grass to grow. As better paying businesses to support the labor force.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/st-louis-minimum-wage_us_595a69bae4b0da2c7324d725

Corrections like people not accepting the stupid! Confederate flags, about slavery
as the laws back then had protection for slavery, to keep their slaves.

~~~~~Those who believe slavery was not a central point of conflict in the Civil War may wish to peruse the South Carolina, Georgia, Mississippi and Texas declarations of secession. Those documents all explicitly cite threats to slavery as reasons for secession. Mississippi's declaration goes so far as to say that “a blow at slavery is a blow at commerce and civilization.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/06/22/confederate-flag-racist_n_7639788.html

~~~~~The KKK rally in Charlottesville was outnumbered by counterprotesters
About 1,000 counterprotesters were there, said city spokeswoman Miriam Dickler.
Shouting "racists go home," the crowd drowned out the Klansmen's chants of "white power." Despite police lines, a few brief scuffles broke out. Counterprotesters tried to stop the Klansmen from entering and leaving the park, video showed.
http://www.cnn.com/2017/07/08/us/kkk-rally-charlottesville-statues/index.html

So there is a correction going on. And that powerful, universal, governing
force love. I hope love steps in making up peoples minds globally to go into the
better of the good! Open your heart!